Review πŸ‘‰ First Man

The remarkable true story of the Moon landing proves to be another giant leap for director Damien Chazelle’s career, whose star has been on a meteoritic rise for the past few years. The Oscar winning director behind La La Land and Whiplash takes a keen eye and a novel approach to portraying this expansive story, deciding to focus on the man rather than the mission. The end result is a heartfelt and utterly engrossing account that leaves a captivating mark on you.

That’s not to say that First Man isn’t about the nuts and bolts of the Space Race and the plight of the USA to beat Russia to the Moon.It’s all there, but the narrative chooses to explore in greater depth the life of Neil Armstrong – the first man to walk on the Moon – and the struggles and challenges he and his family had to overcome to make history.

Neil Armstrong (Ryan Gosling) is drafted into a high priority NASA mission to reach the surface of the Moon. With the Russians making leaps and bounds in their space program, the race is on to get there with the best minds in their respective fields working overtime to make this dream a reality.Relocating with his wife Janet (Claire Foy) and his kids, Neil must handle the pressures of the job at hand, with setbacks, complications and tragedy poised at every juncture.

What initially grabs you is First Man’s unwavering determination in telling the human interest story first and foremost. There are a lot of milestones and big moments to cram into this story but First Man always has Neil Armstrong’s journey at its core, and that’s why the film works so effortlessly. Ryan Gosling hands in a fantastic performance as a determined man who is challenged daily and who can be fearless in every aspect of his day job, but who struggles to convey the gravitas of the situation to his young children.

A film like this, and especially one that is set in this era (1961-1969), could have taken a lazy approach to the character of Janet Armstrong, just painting her into the background as dressing. Josh Singer’s screenplay, adapted from the book by James R. Hansen, thankfully never lets this happen. Her character is real and integral to this story. Claire Foy is a revelation here and gives the film a real balance and strength with her powerful portrayal. Her exchanges with Neil are a cornerstone to the film’s success.

The supporting talent are all superb too with a who’s who of great character actors all lending their considerable talents to this gem of a film. Jason Clarke, Kyle Chandler, Olivia Hamilton, Patrick Fugit, Ciaran Hinds, Ethan Embry, Shea Whigham, Corey Stoll (as Buzz Aldrin), Lukas Haas and Pablo Schreiber all hand in note-worthy performances that collectively leave a mark on the story. First Man is exceptionally efficient in its storytelling, utilising these actors well in a 2hr 21min movie that never lags or feels superfluous at any point.

The film is blessed with a stellar cast and wonderful creatives behind the scenes, but it also has to succeed in a visual sense. Having the lunar surface scenes filmed in IMAX gives First Man a ghostly beauty that really places you on the Moon. It’s immersive in conjuring its atmosphere and expansive in its scope and grandeur to make this sequence truly breathtaking. Throughout the film you get a very real sense of the physicality of the things that these astronauts have to endure. The movie opens with a staggeringly effective fighter-jet scene which conveys speed in a way that I’ve never seen realised on film before. There are more than a few scenes that will cause a bit of motion sickness too – it’s not pleasant, but vitally important in telling this story.

US Republican’s recently took to bashing First Man, calling the film unpatriotic. It’s anything but that, and their narrow-minded opinions (from people who hadn’t even seen the film in the first place) has certainly taken focus away from what an incredible piece of filmmaking First Man actually is. Their complaints stem from (what they see as) a political statement by Chazelle by not featuring a direct scene about the planting of the US flag on the moon.But the American flag is front and centre of this entire film, and it was an artistic choice to focus on the story of the man behind the moment.

First Man is breathtaking cinema told by a true auteur that is fast becoming the voice of a new generation. Chazelle’s choices behind the lens are staggeringly beautiful and chronicle one of the most incredible stories of human endeavour in a way that leaves a lasting impression on the soul. With Ryan Gosling once again leading the line exceptionally well, First Man lands as one of the finest movies of the year, and one that deserves a huge audience – if just to remind modern society that working together, rather than causing conflict and division amongst ourselves, is the key to our existence and growth as a species.









  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Review πŸ‘‰ Venom

Ruben Fleischer’s Venom has many questions to answer. Can it do justice to one of Marvel’s most iconic antiheroes, an alien symbiote that can run, leap and swing like Spider-Man but likes to bite off people’s heads? Can it survive on its own merits and successfully launch its own franchise while Spidey is otherwise engaged in the MCU? Will it compromise 1993 source series Lethal Protector as the PG-13 certificate – 15 in the UK – suggests (Logan and Deadpool dared to go hard-R)? And the two biggies: might it, please God, erase memories of Tobey Maguire dancing in a jazz club, and can Tom Hardy muster up a villainous voice that is in some way intelligible.

The answers are sort of, just about, sadly yes, hmmm, and you betcha – with the help of an industrial sub-woofer. The plot is your standard origin story, as investigative journalist Eddie Brock (Hardy) aims to take down billionaire Carlton Drake (Riz Ahmed), whose Life Foundation has launched a space programme to find cures for the Earthly ills of overpopulation and climate change. As the film opens, we see a homeward-bound shuttle carrying four alien organisms that could possess the key to staving off humankind’s inevitable extinction. Only the ship crashes in East Malaysia and one of the ETs hotfoots it from the wreckage, working through various human hosts while the other three specimens are duly delivered to Drake at his foundation in San Francisco, ready for experimentation to begin.

It’s no spoiler to say that Brock, whose snooping into Drake’s affairs loses him his job and his fiancΓ©e (Michelle Williams), finds himself hosting a symbiote. “I am Venom,” it growls after revealing itself in its full seven-foot, toothy, Gene Simmons-tongued glory. Brock spends the rest of the movie engaged in bicker-banter with the voice in his head and fighting off Drake’s henchmen courtesy of all manner of CGI gymnastics.

Tonally, Venom leaps and stretches like the symbiote itself, hopping from ‘edgy’ character piece (shots of a hunch-shouldered Brock walking the San Francisco streets are Taxi Driver minus the porno theatres) to multiplex-friendly body horror, to riotous buddy-com. Hardy might have been joking (or not) when he said the best 40 minutes of Venom are on the cutting-room floor, but it certainly feels rushed and gutted. The action is solid at best, the computer effects very, well, computer-y, and Williams is granted a role so thankless it makes one of the world’s best actresses seem ordinary.

What saves Venom is Venom. And Brock. Meaning Hardy, who here exhibits a knack for physical comedy that anyone unfortunate enough to see McG’s This Means War could hardly credit. Throwing himself, literally, into the action, he also unleashes a series of yip, yowls and yelps that put Tom Cruise’s Mummy memes to shame. It’s a jerky, whiplash-inducing ride to get there, but come the final act, Venom and Brock have found the perfect symbiosis, and the movie’s found its tone.











  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Review πŸ‘‰ Johnny English Strikes Again


Johnny English requires very little brain power to enjoy. In fact, it might be better to turn off your brain all together. Instead, enjoy it for its physical comedy and you’d get a great laugh out of it.






There are very few people who don’t enjoy comedy series, Mr. Bean. With the titular character, Mr Bean played by Rowan Atkinson, the hit comedy series was enjoyed by people all over the globe, bypassing culture and language barriers, all because of its focus on physical comedy.
Then in 2003, Atkinson created another, similarly goofy character with a penchant for physical comedy, Johnny English. It spawned a sequel in 2011 and this year, Johnny English strikes again.
In this newest instalment, Britain is hit by a cyber-attack that exposes all of their secret agents’ identity (just like what Chelsea Manning did, but a little more stealthily). With all their agents’ position compromised, MI7 has no choice but to turn to their retired agent, Johnny English.
As with previous Johnny English movies, Johnny English Strikes Again follows the same plot, that English, for a very silly reason, is the only person the MI7 is able to deploy for a very important mission. Through sheer will and an enormous amount of luck, English manages to save the day.
It’s a simple plot with very obvious plot twists ahead. There were a few cringe-worthy moments that really didn’t need to be there (the less said about the dance floor scene, the better), and for a movie centered around technology, there were way too many moments, including some crucial plot points, that did not follow the rules and laws of technology (that’s not how VR works people).
Watching this movie requires a lot of suspension of disbelief. None of the stories can or will ever happen in real life, but picking this movie apart will take the enjoyment out of it, so it’s better to just accept it for what it is.
Once we can see past the ridiculous plotline, it becomes immediately obvious what this movie is really about: Rowan Atkinson’s physical comedy, of which he is a master of. In a time where most comedy relies on clever dialogues, it’s refreshing to see a movie with Chaplin-esque comedy. There were many times where the audience laughed because of how ridiculous Atkinson’s English looks.
Angus Bough (Ben Miller) makes a great straight man to English’s funny man. His devotion to English is also especially adorable. Ophelia, played by Olga Kurylenko, is the hot foreign spy and sadly, her performance is somewhat forgettable, as if her presence was only to fill in the hot foreign spy trope and nothing else.
Emma Thompson plays the Prime Minister, but seeing this Prime Minister, you’d question why such a person was ever chosen to lead a country. She’s messy, uncoordinated, and a bit of a foul mouth and the great actress is simply not the most enjoyable thing to watch. Again, there’s that suspension of disbelief in play, that a woman with all those qualities could ever be considered to be the leader, let alone actually lead the country.
Overall, the movie is enjoyable for its physical comedy. There’s a moment near the climax of the movie, after all the unbelievable plot lines and dialogue, where Rowan Atkinson shows what he’s good at. It was a moment of pure silliness and ridiculousness that almost made up for just how stupid the moments before it was. And that pretty much summarises this whole movie: silly and ridiculous.












  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Review πŸ‘‰ Peppermint


On paper, having the guy who directed Taken bring in an unlikely female action hero and have her wreck shop in a full-blown, guns blazing revenge thriller sounds like a good enough idea. Unfortunately, Peppermint is something that sounded a lot better on paper than it ultimately ended up being. Despite a really solid, unexpected and very compelling performance from Jennifer Garner, this doesn't really rise above the level of very average when it comes to such action flicks, a few very visually exciting sequences aside.
Peppermint centers on a woman named Riley North. She awakes from a coma only to be reminded that her husband and daughter were brutally murdered in front of her. Even though the grieving mother is able to identify those who killed her family, they happen to be part of a very powerful drug operation who have their hands in everyone's pockets, including the judge who lets them go free. Instead of going to her court-ordered mental facility, Riley escapes and spends years planning her revenge. Upon her shocking return, she's a new woman complete with a particular set of skills that she's going to use to burn those that wronged her to the ground.
The movie has a more than good enough premise and a director who clearly knows his way around an action movie. But Peppermint mostly feels like a melodramatic, at times corny and tragically stereotypical exercise. It feels very much like a grab bag of things we've seen plenty of before. One part Taken, one part The Punisher and a healthy does of Death Wish. Sometimes that grab bag approach works. In this case, not so much. There are moments of great humor and very entertaining, extra-violent sequences. Director Pierre Morel hasn't really ever suffered in that department. In this case, he just couldn't manage to elevate the material above cop procedural meets slightly-better-than-Red-Box thriller.
Perhaps the biggest tragedy in this whole thing is the idea of turning Jennifer Garner into an action star at this point in her career is a pretty awesome. She tried with Elektra and, as we all know, that didn't go so well. Yet, Garner has worked a lot over the years and is an actress who is in many ways underappreciated. It was a cool idea to have her do something like this and it's a damn shame she didn't get a better a movie to do it in. Garner really looks the part, acts the part and pours herself into it. She is easily the best thing about Peppermint. But it only serves to frustrate because none of the performers around her, save for the stunt guys doing good work when the bullets are flying, don't come up to her level. It feels like she really put the work in. It was a good idea executed to a disappointing level of success.
With Peppermint, it's not even a case of this being a terrible movie. It's certainly not going to ascend high on anyone's list of great action movies or revenge flicks, but it's not an unmitigated disaster or total schlock fest. It's just disappointing. This felt like something with potential that it never comes close to living up to. And with a movie like Mission: Impossible -Fallout still in theaters, it would be downright irresponsible of me to recommend one actually go spend their hard earned money to see STX's latest. But please, someone give Jennifer Garner another shot at being an action hero in a better movie.








  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Review πŸ‘‰ The Nun

First appeared in the movie The Conjuring 2, and had a cameo at Annabelle: Creation, Valak, or the devil in the form of a mysterious nun this time got special attention through The Nun.

Action and looks creepy. Director Corin Hardy (who once made The Hallow) gave many surprises through unexpected scenes and surprising music throughout the film.

The continuous shock effect then makes the audience will be at one point to not stand not laughing because of it. Laughing at yourself and how nervous and stupid the characters in the movie are who like to walk alone in the midnight grave.
Incidents in the old church

The Nun was opened with a scene in a castle building that was transformed into an old, scary church in Romania, in 1952. Two nuns carrying only a teplok lamp as lighting was in infinite fear. They stopped at the door that said 'God Ends Here' or 'God stopped here'.

One of them then suddenly 'disappeared' behind the dark because of a mysterious figure. Another nun ran frightened to save herself and then died 'hanging herself'.

This incident became a case which was later investigated by Father Burke (Demian Bichir), and Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga) sent by the Vatican church of Rome. Both met with Frenchie / Maurice (Jonas Bloquet) who witnessed the discovery of the corpse of the dead nun hanging himself.
For the sake of the investigation effort, the three were then 'forced' to enter the scary and feared old church to find out what was the cause of the incident. Investigations that make them trapped in various strange and creepy events.

Irene, like Lorraine's character at The Conjuring, has the ability to see 'the invisible with the naked eye'. The vision he had was related to the figure of Valak (Bonnie Aarons), the devil was in the form of a nun, which was dangerous and took many victims. In his vision he also met other nuns, Sister Victoria (Charlotte Hope) and Sister Oana (Ingrid Mute).

In the last half of the film, the three main characters must survive among strange events, from being buried alive, whipped, thrown into the air, and or hit hard objects.

The Nun film gave a relentless shock effect.






Signatured



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS